Skip to Main Content
Digital Business Automation Ideas

This is an IBM Automation portal for Digital Business Automation products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (

Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.

Please use the following category to raise ideas for these offerings for all environments (traditional on premises, containers, on cloud):
  • Cloud Pak for Business Automation - including Business Automation Studio and App Designer, Business Automation Insights

  • Business Automation Workflow (BAW) - including BAW, Business Process Manager, Workstream Services, Business Performance Center, Advanced Case Management

  • Content Services - FileNet Content Manager

  • Content Services - Content Manager OnDemand

  • Content Services - Daeja Virtual Viewer

  • Content Services - Navigator

  • Content Services - Content Collector for Email, Sharepoint, Files

  • Content Services - Content Collector for SAP

  • Content Services - Enterprise Records

  • Content Services - Content Manager (CM8)

  • Datacap

  • Automation Document Processing

  • Automation Decision Services (ADS)

  • Operational Decision Manager

  • Robotic Process Automation

  • Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere

  • Blueworks Live

  • Business Automation Manager Open Edition

  • IBM Process Mining

Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal ( - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM. - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.

Status Functionality already exists
Created by Guest
Created on Jan 31, 2022

Don’t remove feature RetePlus ordering modes

As the doc days (, RetePlus ordering modes are deprecated since OCM 8.6. Have not been removed yet in version 8.11.0

The wish is DON'T REMOVE this feature. It’s inherited from CRE, but still very useful with the new DE. In fact, has been used in decision services in production and there is no easy replacement, so it will cause a big impact in existing customers.

Here is an example where this feature is used in real life project. This is pricing application for a company in the Travel&Transportation sector. The decision service is used to determine applicable promotions. There are many potential promotions that can apply in different circumstances. Promotions are not accumulable, so the different promotions are fired in a RuleTask with algorithm "RetePlus", exit criteria “Rule” and rule ordering “Literal”, this way only the most priority promotion is executed. Also, business user can define new promotion rules and can define the priority by ordering the rules in the RuleTask.

There may be some alternative designs for this purpose, but none of them are so good as the one provided by this feature. For instance, splitting each promotion in its own RuleTask and controlling the execution order of the RuleTasks in the Ruleflow, will not work well because the big number of potential promotions.

So, please don't remove this feature.

Idea priority High
  • Admin
    Antony Viaud
    Feb 14, 2022

    Hello, I'm closing this request as there is no plan to remove the core RetePlus behavior. Thanks again for sharing your feedback.

  • Admin
    Antony Viaud
    Feb 4, 2022

    It's taken into account, but doc says: "A RetePlus network is created but there is no agenda. Rules are activated one by one according to the order provided by the body, and the instances are run without reevaluation."

  • Guest
    Feb 3, 2022

    Antony, I can confirm you that "literal" ordering it's taken into account in RetePlus. If you edit the rule task and set a different order in the referenced rules, you have a different result.

    The use case that I described is real and in production, using this feature.


  • Admin
    Antony Viaud
    Feb 2, 2022


    thank you for your feedback.

    Documentation here explains that modes "literal" and "priority" are actually not using RetePlus inference.

    As such, they are quite useless when using RetePlus and that's why they've been deprecated.

    I'm checking with the dev team what would be recommended for sorting rules when using RetePlus (my current understanding is that the RetePlus "Default" mode for RetePlus is "dynamic", which is a superset of static priorities).

    I'll provide an update once it's clear.

  • Guest
    Feb 1, 2022

    If the change of execution order implies a change in the ruleflow that has too much impact. Keep the RetePlus ordering modes.