This is an IBM Automation portal for Digital Business Automation products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).
We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:
Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,
Post an idea.
Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.
Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.
Cloud Pak for Business Automation - including Business Automation Studio and App Designer, Business Automation Insights
Business Automation Workflow (BAW) - including BAW, Business Process Manager, Workstream Services, Business Performance Center, Advanced Case Management
Content Services - FileNet Content Manager
Content Services - Content Manager OnDemand
Content Services - Daeja Virtual Viewer
Content Services - Navigator
Content Services - Content Collector for Email, Sharepoint, Files
Content Services - Content Collector for SAP
Content Services - Enterprise Records
Content Services - Content Manager (CM8)
Datacap
Automation Document Processing
Automation Decision Services (ADS)
Operational Decision Manager
Robotic Process Automation
Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere
Blueworks Live
Business Automation Manager Open Edition
IBM Process Mining
Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.
IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.
ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.
Great! For assignment like in my example, the LawyerID would come from something like the process launch UI where a menu of appropriate recipients could be provided.
Thanks again for your ideas and feedback!
That provided solution seems to work exactly as we want, tested assignTo/assignBack, as well as the organization API at bpmrest-ui, and it can correctly provide a list of possible assignees.
One additional drawback i found, is that the referred user in "LawyerID" is not required to be a member of TEAM:Legal to be able to be assigned the task, so a user could complete a task they arent authorized to, but thats a downside that already exist with the assignTo JS API, which i assume this functionality uses in the background
The only downside now is the "where used" functionality, so our improvement idea could probably be changed to "Improve the visuals and definitions for when using custom assignment". For us the best solution, instead of using custom, would be if there existed an option stated as:
Direct assignment:
JS/bindable variable for userName
JS/Bindable team for return
JS/Bindable team for fallback if userName isnt a valid user or a member in the provided team
Hi. Actually you can preset both the user and the return to team. Here is an example I tried:
Note the semicolon between the USER and the TEAM. With that, the "Return to Team" option should be available.
Hi Dave. The method you mentioned has a few drawback.
First, it doesnt follow the pattern we currently use, where we use swim-lane assignments for the alloted teams to the tasks. If we in the script could write tw.local.reserved.length == 8 ? "USER:"+tw.local.reserved : "TEAM:LANE_ASSIGNMENT" or something, it would be a decent enough solution. By deciding the team with a String instead, we lose the "Where used" functionality, and force artifact names (the team) to be written as unsearchable strings. The same problem occur if you instead of dragging out service flows, instead call services by using tw.system.executeServiceByName("MyService"), with searchability and where used being broken.
Secondly, by using Custom assignment as such, we lose the functionality of returning the task back to the system, if the user for example is on vacation, and we want to automate a service that returns these types of tasks. The original team assignment is never set, since the task was autoassigned to a user, and as such cannot be return to something that is never set.
So for a solution, we would prefer a combination between lane assignment and if a variable contains a valid user_name, autoassign to that user AFTER the initial lane assignment is done, so the task can be properly returned
Hello! What about the approach to set the "Assignments" option of the task to "Custom" and add some script like "USER:"+tw.local.preferredUserID