Skip to Main Content
Digital Business Automation Ideas


This is an IBM Automation portal for Digital Business Automation products. To view all of your ideas submitted to IBM, create and manage groups of Ideas, or create an idea explicitly set to be either visible by all (public) or visible only to you and IBM (private), use the IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com).


Shape the future of IBM!

We invite you to shape the future of IBM, including product roadmaps, by submitting ideas that matter to you the most. Here's how it works:

Search existing ideas

Start by searching and reviewing ideas and requests to enhance a product or service. Take a look at ideas others have posted, and add a comment, vote, or subscribe to updates on them if they matter to you. If you can't find what you are looking for,

Post your ideas
  1. Post an idea.

  2. Get feedback from the IBM team and other customers to refine your idea.

  3. Follow the idea through the IBM Ideas process.


Please use the following category to raise ideas for these offerings for all environments (traditional on premises, containers, on cloud):
  • Cloud Pak for Automation - including Business Automation Studio, Business Automation Insights

  • Business Automation Workflow (BAW) - including BAW, Business Process Manager, Workstream Services, Business Performance Center, Advanced Case Management

  • Content and Capture Services - including Filenet, Automation Document Processing, Daeja, Navigator, Content Collector, Enterprise Records, Business Automation Content Analyzer, Datacap, Automation Mobile Capture, Content Manager OnDemand, IBM Content Manager

  • Automation Decision Services (ADS) - including ADS, Operational Decision Manager

  • Robotic Process Automation

  • Robotic Process Automation with Automation Anywhere

  • IBM Blueworks Live


Specific links you will want to bookmark for future use

Welcome to the IBM Ideas Portal (https://www.ibm.com/ideas) - Use this site to find out additional information and details about the IBM Ideas process and statuses.

IBM Unified Ideas Portal (https://ideas.ibm.com) - Use this site to view all of your ideas, create new ideas for any IBM product, or search for ideas across all of IBM.

ideasibm@us.ibm.com - Use this email to suggest enhancements to the Ideas process or request help from IBM for submitting your Ideas.


Status Future consideration
Created by Guest
Created on Apr 17, 2018

Enhance Bulk API for BPM REST To Include Failure Responses

We are using BPM Advanced 8.5.7 currently using a 3-step process to use REST query/claim/finish call to update a task in received status for a given process instance. I would like IBM to reconsider it's approach to how the bulk API support is handled with the BPM REST interface. My expectation is that it should work in such a way that all success and failure results are echoed back in a bulk response in the same order that they were submitted in the request. Ultimately, there should be a response summary that includes how many requests were processed and how many were successful or failed. If there were 10 requests and all were successful then it should be echoed with a success return code. If it were 10 failures, then a failure return code. If it were a mix of both, then it would be a partial response code. What I get now on a failure is a 404 HTTP status code, which is not very intuitive. This is related to PMR 16563 122 000.

Idea priority High
RFE ID 119006
RFE URL
RFE Product IBM Business Process Manager
  • Guest
    May 2, 2018

    Another use case that I want to share with IBM is one that I believe is applicable to both headless BPM applications and traditional coach BPM applications. There is the case where a user is performing a team distribution role (typically a manager) where a group of process instances would be assigned to a BPM user. This assignment process could be accomplished on an individual basis, however, from a UI it would make sense for the manager user is selecting multiple process instances to distribute across a team. The bulk API would allow for a single REST request per assignee that would be generated. Again, this should be a very common use case that bulk could support if it returned failures.

  • Guest
    Apr 26, 2018

    Attachment (Use case): This attachment provides the set of available actions to state matrix and corresponding state diagram to help explain the interactions we have built within BPM.

  • Guest
    Apr 25, 2018

    The use case is we are trying to follow a 3 step process that uses a ‘Query – Claim – Finish' sequence to lookup the task ID to perform the claim and finish to complete a task and update data values stored in the business object defined to BPM.
    If since the task ID is not something we currently track at time of instance creation, we have to perform the query but this step potentially could be taken out of the sequence if start instance returned the task ID of the first human activity.
    I am attaching a diagram from IIB that I believe is attached to the RFE as a better visual of what we are doing today exercising the same thing but implemented in a process loop handling bulk requests one at a time.

    We are using the headless implementation of BPM so we have written our own UI with microservices that call out to IIB exposed user operations (assign, cancel, complete, unassign) via REST-enabled services. Through the UI, a user takes action on one or more process instance. The “or more” part is what would trigger the bulk scenario. So if a user assigns 10 instances from the UI, that would equate to a process loop of 10 assign requests that ultimately follow the sequence described below. If we had the bulk REST functionality implemented we could make a single call at each step in the sequence so it's still a 3 step process however, it would be only a single iteration regardless whether the user asked for 1 or 100 assign requests. The query, claim, and finish are all done via the REST API to communicate with BPM. Hopefully, this explains things to a level that makes sense.

  • Guest
    Apr 17, 2018

    Attachment (Use case)

  • Guest
    Apr 17, 2018

    Attachment (Use case)